Copperhead (xq10_o5995ozes88sezw33)
|
|
|
Pattern RLE
Glider synthesis
#C [[ GRID MAXGRIDSIZE 14 THEME Catagolue ]]
#CSYNTH xq10_o5995ozes88sezw33 costs 13 gliders (true).
#CLL state-numbering golly
x = 81, y = 47, rule = B3/S23
50bo$48bobo$49b2o27bobo$44bobo31b2o$45b2o32bo$45bo2$41bobo$42b2o$
42bo2$39bo$40b2o3bo$39b2o5bo$44b3o9$2bo$obo$b2o$66b2o$66bo$3b2o62b
3o$4b2o63bo$3bo3$61bo$62b2o$61b2o3$61b2o$48b3o9bobo$50bo11bo$49bo$
36b2o$37b2o$36bo5bo$42b2o$41bobo!
Sample occurrences
There are 315 sample soups in the Catagolue:
Official symmetries
| Symmetry | Soups | Sample soup links |
|---|---|---|
| D2_+2 | 6 | • • • • • • |
| D4_+2 | 100 | • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • |
| D4_+4 | 100 | • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • |
| D8_4 | 49 | • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • |
| H2_+2 | 1 | • |
| H4_+2 | 29 | • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • |
| H4_+4 | 14 | • • • • • • • • • • • • • • |
Unofficial symmetries
| Symmetry | Soups | Sample soup links |
|---|---|---|
| ikpx2_stdin | 1 | • |
| lifecompetes_stdin_test | 7 | • • • • • • • |
| ror_stdin_test | 5 | • • • • • |
| shipthread_stdin | 3 | • • • |
Comments (19)
Displaying comments 1 to 19.
On 2022-01-11 at 23:53:40 UTC, andrewnotgonnatellya wrote:
in before C1 appearance
On 2019-10-19 at 23:13:08 UTC, Someone wrote:
COMMENTS WORK AGAIN!!!!!!
On 2019-10-19 at 23:12:56 UTC, Someone wrote:
Testing...
On 2019-01-06 at 17:34:15 UTC, Someone wrote:
Period 2000 copperhead:
https://catagolue.appspot.com/object/xq2000_o5995ozes88sezw33/b3s23
On 2018-12-09 at 01:16:59 UTC, Someone wrote:
Discovered by zdr circa march 5, 2016
On 2017-05-30 at 19:49:19 UTC, paulrw63@live.com wrote:
Some joe posted a collision bet the Copperhead and 2 eaters (one fancy) that destroys the Copperhead and leaves the eaters. Somebody retorted that this was a waste as the Copperhead does not occur naturally and just destroying it by 2 eaters was crummy.
On 2017-01-09 at 08:58:15 UTC, 27saka.fitrady wrote:
All hail zdr, founder of The Search for Slow Spaceships (TSSS, I made that up just now) and zfind.
On 2017-01-09 at 02:45:01 UTC, paulrw63@live.com wrote:
Yes, the Copperhead is neat and pretty. Now I have named many,many patterns, and I wish peop would accept my names. Many were nameless, and some did not have good names. Usually my names are descriptive. Copperhead is not obvious, BUT it IS nice and rings well, so I accepted it.
Names like ROWLAND EMMETT'S FUNICULAR, PILEDRIVER, ROSE WINDOW, FERN LEAF, WOLF TRAP, THE CONJOINED, WELLDRILLER, HORNET HIVE, MANHATTEN PROJECT, MACE, BROADWAY, FROG BOG, LINCOLN TUNNEL, SEWING MACHINE, THE LION OF BELFORT, RADIOLARIAN, SIGNAL INJECTOR, PLAN 9 FROM OUTER SPACE, TV TEST PATTERN, INTERNAL COMBUSTION (the last from a defective website that would NOT show a pattern named this, so I put the monicker on an appropiate P13 osc.),WILY COYOTE, ///
On 2016-11-29 at 14:18:11 UTC, Someone wrote:
Occurrences in D8_4 and D4_+4.
On 2016-08-22 at 19:46:25 UTC, Someone wrote:
3 .
On 2016-06-22 at 13:27:18 UTC, applebottom.applefamily wrote:
Second one!
On 2016-05-09 at 16:52:41 UTC, connors12321 wrote:
The only pattern I've ever named... and now we know it occurs naturally.
On 2016-04-05 at 01:32:36 UTC, nicobrownmath wrote:
Really cool! Too bad it forms so fast, I don't think it would be possible to improve the synthesis. I wonder if we'll ever see a tagalong occur?
On 2016-04-05 at 00:25:04 UTC, Someone wrote:
!!!! Now let's find something unseen..
On 2016-04-04 at 23:50:18 UTC, applebottom.applefamily wrote:
And here it is now, in the ash of a D2_+2 soup.
On 2016-03-09 at 22:24:36 UTC, Someone wrote:
hdk
On 2016-03-06 at 22:03:56 UTC, Someone wrote:
I'm curious, how good is the object recognition in catagolue? Had someone entered this apgcode a week ago before the ship was known, would the site correctly simulate it and declare all its parameters? I suppose it would have to, it just creates these pages on the fly and verification is easy. Once any page has accrued comments though, there would necessarily exist some record of the page visible by Adam. I find it a funny thought that one might someday find a new small spaceship with a search program and instead of linking the actual ship in the forums, just post a comment on the catagolue page and wait.
Also, seeing any object encoded in apgcode form makes it deceptively simple-looking. The actual space of xq10_[+17 characters] is enormous, even once one enforces some symmetry, but it looks so little!
On 2016-03-06 at 20:30:07 UTC, Someone wrote:
xdddddddd
On 2016-03-06 at 19:48:35 UTC, Someone wrote:
ohhhhh yeeeaaaaahhhhh
Please log in to post comments.